The Most Based Decision: Why Banning Jon Del Arroz from Based Con 2025 Upholds True Integrity

In the world of science fiction and fantasy conventions, where fans and creators gather to celebrate imaginative storytelling free from mainstream ideological pressures, Based Con has carved out a niche as a haven for unapologetic, freedom-loving enthusiasts. Founded on principles of open dialogue and resistance to cancel culture, the event—organized by author Robert Kroese—has become a beacon for those tired of the politicized gatekeeping that plagues larger conventions. So, when Kroese made the call to ban controversial author Jon Del Arroz from the 2025 iteration, it wasn't a contradiction of the con's ethos; it was the embodiment of it. This move, far from being an act of exclusion, stands as one of the most "based" decisions in recent genre history, prioritizing community health over endless drama.

Kroese's reasoning, as reflected in public exchanges, boils down to a straightforward assessment of Del Arroz's behavior. In response to Del Arroz's accusations and complaints, Kroese effectively characterized him as someone who thrives on manufactured victimhood, noting that such "drama queens aren't scary." This echoes the sentiment that all Del Arroz knows how to do is "jump in front of trains and play the victim"—a pattern where he inserts himself into controversies, only to cry foul when pushback occurs. Del Arroz's recent attacks on Based Con appear to follow this script precisely, using the ban as fodder to promote his own work. Just days before the event, he took to social media to decry the decision, framing it as "cancel culture" while conveniently plugging his latest book as the "#1 religious philosophy book that's so based it's BANNED from Robert Kroese's 'BasedCon'." This self-promotional pivot isn't subtle; it's a calculated move to rally his audience, boost sales, and paint himself as a martyr in the culture wars.

But why was the ban the right move? Evidence from Del Arroz's public history suggests a track record of behavior that could disrupt the sincere, integrity-driven atmosphere Based Con strives to maintain. Reports and accounts from within the sci-fi community detail alleged instances of stalking and harassment. For example, fellow author Jim C. Hines compiled a documented history of Del Arroz's interactions, including repeated ignoring of boundaries, such as continuing to contact individuals after being asked to stop, and escalating online feuds. In one notable case, author Rachael Acks reported Del Arroz's persistent messaging despite clear requests to cease, leading to broader community concerns about his conduct. Additionally, public court records have surfaced allegations of domestic violence in a case involving Del Arroz, though details remain subject to interpretation and he has not been convicted of related charges. These alleged patterns extend to professional repercussions, such as Patreon banning him for violations of their hate speech policies and a dismissed lawsuit against Worldcon 76 where courts ruled against him on multiple claims of discrimination. While Del Arroz disputes these narratives, portraying them as smears from ideological opponents, the cumulative reports paint a picture of someone whose presence could invite unnecessary conflict into an event meant for positive engagement.

Further scrutiny falls on Del Arroz's recent non-fiction work, which he has admitted falls outside his usual expertise in fiction and comics. Titled something along the lines of a religious philosophy exploration—drawing from his Christian-themed sci-fi like Glorified, an allegory for biblical revelation—the book has drawn criticism from readers and observers who view it as less a scholarly contribution and more a rant aimed at tearing down fellow creators while elevating his own fictional output. Community discussions, including on platforms like Facebook, warn of Del Arroz as a "liar and grifter," with some accusing him of misrepresenting Christian values for personal gain. When faced with critiques from those with theological backgrounds or expertise, Del Arroz has reportedly dismissed them, doubling down on his narrative rather than engaging substantively. This approach, critics argue, demonizes broad swaths of the creative community under the guise of cultural critique, all while steering attention back to his books and comics. It's a tactic that aligns with his broader public persona, where controversy seems to serve as a marketing tool.

Del Arroz's rhetoric extends to the comic industry, where he positions himself as a crusader against what he calls "woke" influences. He has publicly stated intentions to combat the "destruction of culture in comics and book publishing," vowing to use every resource at his disposal to challenge mainstream companies. In various videos and posts, he discusses industry collapses, such as those involving publishers like IDW and Boom! Studios, framing them as opportunities to dismantle established players. While he hasn't explicitly detailed "moles" within these companies in every instance, his commentary implies insider knowledge or networks aimed at exposing and undermining them from within. This aggressive stance, while appealing to some, risks turning collaborative spaces like conventions into battlegrounds, which is precisely what Based Con seeks to avoid.

In contrast, Based Con under Kroese's leadership exemplifies sincerity and integrity. By addressing potential disruptions head-on, Kroese protects the event's core mission: fostering a space where creators and fans can connect without the shadow of personal vendettas. Past iterations have featured diverse authors and sales events that highlight emerging talent, all while steering clear of the performative outrage that plagues other gatherings. This ban isn't about politics; it's about preserving a positive environment. Del Arroz's ongoing attacks only underscore the wisdom of the decision, as they devolve into self-righteous promotion rather than constructive dialogue.

Ultimately, Kroese's choice to exclude Del Arroz reinforces what makes Based Con truly "based": a commitment to real community over endless grievance-mongering. In a genre often divided by egos and ideologies, this stands as a model of principled leadership—one that fans can support without reservation.